Byron Donalds Denies Implying Black People Were Better Off Under Jim Crow Despite Video Evidence

U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, Republican of Florida, speaks outside the Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City on May 14, 2024 | Source: ALEX KENT / Getty

When Florida Republican Byron Donalds implied that Black families faired better during the Jim Crow era, he was demonstrably wrong. He was wrong when he claimed that during the era, “more Black people voted conservatively,” because the factual truth is most Black people during most of that era weren’t allowed to vote at all. He was also, at best, misleading when he said Black marriage was stronger during Jim Crow. (I’ll get more into that later.)

Yes, Donalds was wrong when he invoked Jim Crow during the Trump campaign’s “Congress, Cognac and Cigars” event, which was meant to “garner the Black male vote,” according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, which noted that the event was held in the “whitest and most conservative” part of the city. (Also, they could have called the event “House Negroes, Hennessy and Hookah,” but that probably would have been too on the nose.) But what’s more annoying than Donalds being wrong is the way he has responded to the backlash by pretending he didn’t say what he said, and that what he said wasn’t an intentional nod to the Jim Crow era meant to put a positive spin on Black oppression. (The Florida congressman might as well have been joining the Florida Board of Education in arguing that slaves benefitted from slavery.)

Trump VP contender Byron Donalds claims life was better for Black Americans “during Jim Crow”

— Biden-Harris HQ (@BidenHQ) June 5, 2024

On Saturday, Donalds made an appearance on MSNBC and faced off against Rev. Al Sharpton, who pressed him on his Jim Crow remarks, to which Donalds essentially responded, “What Jim Crow remarks? How can you say I said what everybody clearly heard me say even though I didn’t say it?” 

“Why did you say Jim Crow?!” Rev. Al Sharpton tears into Rep. Byron Donalds over his remarks about Jim Crow. (Video: MSNBC)

— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) June 10, 2024

First, let’s get into how Sharpton, who was actually alive during Jim Crow and part of the civil rights movement to end it, read the hell out of Donads, who was not around at the time and does not have any first-hand experiences with Black marriage.

“The era of Eisenhower and Harry Truman, you name Jim Crow. There’s only one way you could deal with Jim Crow, and that’s by race.

I mean, look, I’m a look. You and I had mutual friends. People say you’re a straight shooter. I mean, we may disagree on politics. I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt.

But, look, you were born in Brooklyn. You went down into the South, went to Florida State. You have an interracial marriage, you’re the congressman of a district. There’s not a Black district.

I mean, how can you even live with yourself acting like Jim Crow was a good era, or better era for Blacks? What happened to you?”

Actually, Sharpton could have gone in a lot harder if he wanted to. He could have mentioned that Donalds’ white wife is on the advisory board of Moms for Liberty, a group that the internet has dubbed “Ku Klux Karen,” because it’s made up almost entirely of white women who have such setting hatred for Black and LGBTQ studies that the Southern Poverty Law Center labeled the organization a hate group. At the very least, Donalds’ choice of spouse demonstrates his mentality and puts his rudimentary understanding of Black history in context.

Anyway, Donalds was visibly flustered by Sharpton’s comments, and all he could say in response is that he didn’t say what we all heard him say.

“Okay, that’s real cute. That’s real cute. I did not say that!” Donalds said, to which Sharpton replied, “I’m not being cute! I’m asking you a straight-up question!”

And I’m not going to sit here and have you insinuate that against me, because right now you’re lying about what I said,” Donalds said. “I did say Jim Crow. I did reference it…”

“Four times,” Sharpton interjected, to which Donalds responded by correcting him, noting that he was off by one on how many times the GOP rep mentioned Jim Crow.

“Three times. That’s not to say that it was better. I never said that. Those words never came out of my mouth. When are you going to get that through your skull, and everybody else’s skull?” Donalds asked, to which Sharpton responded, ” Maybe because our skull has ears and we heard what you said!”

Now, to be fair, Donalds is right that he never said the exact words, “Black people were better off under Jim Crow,” but he did all but say it.

“During Jim Crow, the Black family was together,” Donalds said. “During Jim Crow, more Black people were not just conservative — Black people have always been conservative-minded — but more Black people voted conservatively. And then H.E.W., Lyndon Johnson — you go down that road, and now we are where we are.”

First of all, if Donalds did not intend to imply that Black people faired better under Jim Crow, why mention the policies of President Lyndon B. Johnson, whose most well-known political move regarding Black people was the signing of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act? (Note, Johnson was still a racist, but since Donalds is currently one of Donald Trump’s most loyal Black leg-humpers, anti-Black bigotry couldn’t possibly be his issue with the 36th president.)

Truthfully, even if Donlads’ only point was that during the time of Jim Crow, the Black nuclear family was more prevalent, he was still being oversimplistic to the point of being flat-out wrong.

From The Grio:

Donalds is partially right that the rate of Black marriages has declined since the Jim Crow era. The percentage of Black children born to unmarried mothers has also dramatically increased. However, those statistics hold true for every racial demographic. While Donalds would like to attribute this to the Democrats, government handouts and “welfare” programs, people who know things understand that out-of-wedlock births correlate with povertyeducation and income more than race. Plus, first-time white moms are more likely to have a “shotgun wedding” when they get pregnant.

Furthermore, Donald’s entire definition of “family” is based on marriage statistics, but researchers who actually cite facts found “no significant differences” between how unmarried Black fathers interact with their children compared to other races. The only difference they noted is that “White fathers spend significantly fewer days per month” with their children than Black fathers. 

So, Donalds was loud, wrong and anti-Black as hell, and now that he’s getting dragged across media and social mediamuch like Black people were dragged from the rear bumpers of white people’s pickup trucks during Jim Crow—he’s trying to hide his hands after throwing wannabe-white supremacist stones.

You said what you said, Byron, and owning up to it would be far less cowardly.


‘Uncle Tom’: Video Shows Rep. Byron Donalds Get Called A ‘Race Traitor’ During D.C. Campus Protest

Byron Donalds Claims ‘More And More Black Americans Are Saying We Gotta Have Trump Back’

The post Byron Donalds Denies Implying Black People Were Better Off Under Jim Crow Despite Video Evidence appeared first on NewsOne.

Help Stop Hate! Spread Love

Widely disseminated misinformation is extremely harmful and serves as a catalyst for hatred, violence and prejudice of every kind. This is counterproductive to the unification and strengthening of a nation. News outlets and journalists have a major responsibility to maintain a high degree of partiality and truthfulness that many Americans feel is not being honored. ADL, the Anti-Semitism Defense League is dedicated to offering impartial education on issues involving anti-Semitism to help Americans make informed decisions. A not-for-profit public service organization powered by Love, ADL provides free resources that educate society on anti-Semitism and ways to work together to combat the ancient hatred while promoting equality and prosperity for all people.

Free Download


Featured Articles

Breach of Contract and Conspiracy to Deprive of Civil Rights: An Evaluation of Potential Legal Claims and Criminal Charges Stemming from the Defamatory Social Lynching of Kyrie Irving

Basketball star Kyrie Irving captured the media’s attention when he faced allegations of anti-Semitism due to a social media post containing a link to the film, “Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black America.” Succumbing to external pressure, Irving removed the controversial post and offered a public apology. Nonetheless, upon further examination of the circumstances, it appears that Irving might have been criminally deprived of his rights, and could potentially possess a legal claim against his former employer for violating contractual terms.

Send Us A Message

News & Opinions