Formerly Incarcerated People In Tennessee Must Be Able To Buy A Gun To Vote

Source: rruntsch / Getty

Tennessee election officials confirmed on Tuesday they will be moving forward with a mandate that requires convicted felons to get their gun rights restored before they can become eligible to vote, clamping down harder on the state’s voting rights restoration policy. 

According to AP, last summer, election officials interpreted a Supreme Court ruling requiring the formerly incarcerated to get their full citizenship rights restored before they can be eligible to vote to also include gun rights as a stipulation. 

“Under the Tennessee Constitution, the right to bear arms is a right of citizenship,” State Elections Coordinator Mark Goins told AP. 

Since the change with implemented by election officials in July, almost all voting rights restorations in the state have been halted. According to AP, more than almost all voting rights restorations. In the seven months before it was implemented, around 200 people were approved and 120 denied, according to the secretary of state’s office.

In Tennessee, all felony drug crimes and felonies involving violence strip away someone’s gun rights. The formerly Incarcerated must get a pardon from a governor to restore them.

Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit advocacy group, is pushing back against election officials’ decision by filing a  federal class-action lawsuit against the state for their restoration process, arguing that it suppresses the Black vote. 

According to the suit, the state doesn’t make clear which officials can sign the necessary forms, provides no criteria for denial, and offers no avenue for appeal. The formerly incarcerated must also be up to date on restitution, court costs and child support payments to be eligible. 

“Despite the Tennessee legislature’s clear intent to create meaningful pathways for voting rights restoration, the Elections Division, with help from the Attorney General’s office, continues to twist the law into tortured knots to prevent the 475,000 Tennesseans, including over 20% of voting age Black Tennesseans, with past felony convictions from voting,” Blair Bowie, director of Campaign Legal Center’s Restore Your Vote, told AP.

Even with the toughened restrictions on voting, some Tennessee lawmakers want even tougher laws. 

“Overall, I’m not in favor of felons voting. I think they’ve committed a serious crime, serious offense against the state,” Senate Speaker Randy McNally told AP. And until they’re out of jail and either been pardoned or exonerated for what they did, then they forfeit that right.”


Dirty Cops Who Killed Tyre Nichols Get Dozens Of Their Cases Dropped By Memphis DA

Black Women More Likely To Have A Black Spouse, New Data Shows

The post Formerly Incarcerated People In Tennessee Must Be Able To Buy A Gun To Vote appeared first on NewsOne.

Help Stop Hate! Spread Love

Widely disseminated misinformation is extremely harmful and serves as a catalyst for hatred, violence and prejudice of every kind. This is counterproductive to the unification and strengthening of a nation. News outlets and journalists have a major responsibility to maintain a high degree of partiality and truthfulness that many Americans feel is not being honored. ADL, the Anti-Semitism Defense League is dedicated to offering impartial education on issues involving anti-Semitism to help Americans make informed decisions. A not-for-profit public service organization powered by Love, ADL provides free resources that educate society on anti-Semitism and ways to work together to combat the ancient hatred while promoting equality and prosperity for all people.

Free Download


Featured Articles

Breach of Contract and Conspiracy to Deprive of Civil Rights: An Evaluation of Potential Legal Claims and Criminal Charges Stemming from the Defamatory Social Lynching of Kyrie Irving

Basketball star Kyrie Irving captured the media’s attention when he faced allegations of anti-Semitism due to a social media post containing a link to the film, “Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black America.” Succumbing to external pressure, Irving removed the controversial post and offered a public apology. Nonetheless, upon further examination of the circumstances, it appears that Irving might have been criminally deprived of his rights, and could potentially possess a legal claim against his former employer for violating contractual terms.

Send Us A Message

News & Opinions