Rolling Stones Founder Apologizes For Racist And Sexist Remark Regarding His Exclusively White Male Book

Source: Eugene Gologursky / Getty

The only thing more obnoxious than a racist comment is the racist commenter’s apology for said statement because the “apology” always includes everything except, “I’m sorry for being racist.”

It’s always, “I misspoke,” or, “I’m not racist, I just said something stupid,” or, “I’m sorry my wording sounded racist, but that was not my intent,” or, “Everyone who knows me knows I don’t have a racist bone in my body.” (I honestly feel bad for all of the racist skeletons roaming the Earth wondering why their owners refuse to claim them.)

Rolling Stone co-founder Jann Wenner has been removed from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation’s board of directors because he said a racist and sexist thing, but to let him tell it, his “badly chosen words” are what caused the harm, not his racism.

During an interview with the New York Times, Wenner was asked about a book he wrote, titled The Masters, that features interviews with Mick Jagger, Bob Dylan, John Lennon, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Jerry Garcia and Pete Townsend—all of whom are notably white and male. So, Wenner was asked why he only included white men in his book, and he generally gave the same answer Tim Burton did while explaining why all of his films are so overwhelmingly Caucasian. Only Wenner arguably managed to be even more condescending toward the people he excluded.

From Deadline:

Asked by the Times why he confined the book’s interviews to white males, Wenner said “it just fell together that way.”

He then said that none of the women he considered were “as articulate enough on this intellectual level.”

He added that the people he did interview were selected from his personal interests and love of them, and “were the kind of philosophers of rock.”

Wenner also used the “articulate” argument in his explanation on why he excluded Black artists.

“Of Black artists — you know, Stevie Wonder, genius, right? I suppose when you use a word as broad as ‘masters,’ the fault is using that word. Maybe Marvin Gaye, or Curtis Mayfield? I mean, they just didn’t articulate at that level.”

Before we get into Wenner’s apology, let’s start with his first lie: “It just fell together that way.”

I’ve written before about how the historic overwhelming whiteness of the entertainment industry is no accident. It’s the result of white people needing to see themselves on screen and being appeased by the exclusively white gatekeepers of American pop culture who also view whiteness as the default. White people complain about “forced diversity,” but the forced whiteness that has existed throughout history is the “race pandering” they continue to refuse to acknowledge.

I can’t be mad at Jann Wenner for expressing how many white music, TV & film critics feel about Black artists…

Then act like it’s a triumph when those same critics deem Black artists worthy of their approval, awards or respect.

— Michael Harriot (@michaelharriot) September 17, 2023

So, when a white man only believes the legacies of white men, the most catered to and overwhelmingly represented demographic in American entertainment history, are worth cataloging, that’s not just the way it “fell together”—that’s the way it is by design. 

I mean, come on—Stevie Wonder, Marvin Gaye, and Curtis Mayfield “didn’t articulate” at the level of Bono and Mick Jagger? No, that’s a white man’s opinion if I’ve ever heard one.

Actually, what does “didn’t articulate” even mean in this context? It almost sounds like Wenner hit us with the opposite of, “You speak so well,” which is inherently racist in itself, but whatever. Either way, it appears that Wenner was using the word “articulate” incorrectly, which is pretty inarticulate of him.

What’s also interesting is that even when Wenner gives up a few examples of Black recording artists who are at least technically “genius,” he excludes Black women, which is wild considering the legacy of a certain Black woman who is widely considered the “Godmother of Rock ‘n’ Roll.”

Someone tell Wenner that Rosetta Tharpe would like a word.

I know what Jann Wenner said & did was wildly racist and I know the NYT reporter was well intentioned but can we PLEASE kill the phrase “women *or* Black people” once and for all???

ESPECIALLY in Rock & Roll.


— Stefána Urquelle (she/her). (@MsPackyetti) September 18, 2023

The irony of Rolling Stone co-founder Jann Wenner dismissing Black and female artists when he got the name of his magazine from a Muddy Waters song and the rock-n-roll genre he loves so much was created by Sister Rosetta Tharpe—a Black woman.

— Jenee Darden (@CocoaFly) September 16, 2023

In light of Jann Wenner torching his legacy by declaring that women and Black artists are not articulate enough to be on the level of “Masters” (which, dogwhistle), here’s a video of Sister Rosetta Tharpe, arguably the inventor of rock and roll.

— The Theater Lovers | Will & Rachael (@theater_lovers) September 17, 2023

OK, now let’s get into Wenner’s old crusty apology.

“In my interview with The New York Times I made comments that diminished the contributions, genius and impact of Black and women artists and I apologize wholeheartedly for those remarks,” Wenner wrote. “The Masters is a collection of interviews I’ve done over the years that seemed to me to best represent an idea of rock ’n’ roll’s impact on my world; they were not meant to represent the whole of music and its diverse and important originators but to reflect the high points of my career and interviews I felt illustrated the breadth and experience in that career. They don’t reflect my appreciation and admiration for myriad totemic, world-changing artists whose music and ideas I revere and will celebrate and promote as long as I live. I totally understand the inflammatory nature of badly chosen words and deeply apologize and accept the consequences.”

Sure, Jann.

If Wenner’s book was “not meant to represent the whole of music and its diverse and important originators,” he would have said something along those lines the first time he was asked why The Masters was so white male-exclusive—but that’s not what he said. Instead, he implied that white men just so happened to be the only ones he felt were on a high enough “level” to be worth his time. It’s not the wording that is racist and/or sexist, it’s the sentiment. 

It’s always the sentiment.


Black Woman Says She Was Fired From City Council For Speaking Against Racism And Sexual Harassment

Black Band Director Tased And Arrested For Not Ending Performance At Cops Request

The post Rolling Stones Founder Apologizes For Racist And Sexist Remark Regarding His Exclusively White Male Book appeared first on NewsOne.

Help Stop Hate! Spread Love

Widely disseminated misinformation is extremely harmful and serves as a catalyst for hatred, violence and prejudice of every kind. This is counterproductive to the unification and strengthening of a nation. News outlets and journalists have a major responsibility to maintain a high degree of partiality and truthfulness that many Americans feel is not being honored. ADL, the Anti-Semitism Defense League is dedicated to offering impartial education on issues involving anti-Semitism to help Americans make informed decisions. A not-for-profit public service organization powered by Love, ADL provides free resources that educate society on anti-Semitism and ways to work together to combat the ancient hatred while promoting equality and prosperity for all people.

Free Download


Featured Articles

Breach of Contract and Conspiracy to Deprive of Civil Rights: An Evaluation of Potential Legal Claims and Criminal Charges Stemming from the Defamatory Social Lynching of Kyrie Irving

Basketball star Kyrie Irving captured the media’s attention when he faced allegations of anti-Semitism due to a social media post containing a link to the film, “Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black America.” Succumbing to external pressure, Irving removed the controversial post and offered a public apology. Nonetheless, upon further examination of the circumstances, it appears that Irving might have been criminally deprived of his rights, and could potentially possess a legal claim against his former employer for violating contractual terms.

Send Us A Message

News & Opinions